 |
|
LaGrange
Commercial Area Planning Analysis
Mike Rosen Architects, P.C. Seattle Design
Studio |
|
| |
| A GRAPHICAL
ANALYSIS |
 |
 |
 |
| 1. Buildings Only |
2. Streets Only |
3. Streets and Parking |
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| 4. Streets and Buildings |
5. Streets, Buildings, and Parking |
6. Buildings Highlighted |
| |
|
|
|
| As a tool
to aid in the understanding of the current plan, and the various implications
therof, a number of figure-ground studies have been created, as shown above.
The studies are intended to show the patterns created by circulation (streets)
and built structure (buildings). Once these patterns are understood, it should
be come possible to devise strageties for strengthen desirable patterns and
minimize negative ones. |
| |
| CIRCULATION PATTERNS |
 |
 |
| Patterns Established |
Questionable Conditions |
| |
|
|
This
analysis is based on the street patterns, with parking removed. In general,
these streets create a very clear pattern of circulation. The solid red lines
in the diagram on the left indicate vehicular traffic, while the dashed lines
indicate purely pedestrian circulation.
Two possibly quesionable
conditions present themselves when examining this diagram:
Condition A: A potentially confusing spur from the circle to the
South leads into a holding area outside the Assisting Living building.
Condition B: A potentially
confusing street containing condition due to the fact that a street onto which
houses front is actually an access to parking, and does not lead anywhere
else.
Potential Solutions: Condition
A: Emphasize Primary Circulation, downplay service area. Condition B: 1. Provide through Circulation. 2.
Eliminate the Conflict by providing direct access to the
parking. |
| |
| SPACES |
 |
 |
| Spaces |
Blocks |
|
|
|
Another
analysis, this of the spaces created by buildings, brings up another condition
worthy of study.
On the left, various spaces are color coded. Green represents positive public spaces intentionally
created by the placement of buildings. Blue represents spaces created by
parking. generally to the "back side" of buildings" In most cases, these are
essentially hidden from pubic view. Yellow represents spaces created by
deference to existing buildings. Red represents a space between buildings created
somewhat accidentally by placing significant parking in front of or next to a
building, rather than behind it, exposing parking to public
view,
On the right, the perceived blocks created by groupings
of buildings is indicated. Once again, we see that the area created at the
location of the question mark (?) seems to vary
from the overall patterns being developed.
Potential
Solution: Move the building forward, place the parking behind, and clean up
parking access. |
|
| RECOMMENDATIONS |
| |
 |
| |
The
following recommendations are in response to the issues identified
above:
A. Move buildings toward the street, develop parking
behind.
B. Simplify intersection by eliminating extraneous parking access.
Coordinate with parking access across the street.
C. Eliminate vehicular access
through artist's residences, develop continuous boardwalk that brings this
feature all the way out to Main Street.
D. Clean up parking access,
diminish relative visual impact of drives vs. streets.
E. Entry road
seemed excessively wide. Reduced from 48 feet to 36 (pulled away from assisted
living).
F. Modify shape of building to coordinated better with overall plan.
Create entry structure off off plaza compatible with other buildings on the
plaza.
G. Coordinate design of four buildings around angled portion of Main
Street to create a node. |
| |
| REVISED GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS: |
| |
 |
 |
 |
| 1. Buildings Only |
2. Streets Only |
3. Streets and Parking |
| |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| 4. Streets and Buildings |
5. Streets, Buildings, and Parking |
6. Buildings Highlighted |
| |
|
|
|